Snatching
Inertia From the Jaws of Change
What
makes change, particularly in sales organisations, so hard? For one thing managers grossly underestimate the difficulty
that is involved in changing a sales force.
The actions they take are generally too small and too piece
meal to bring about meaningful improvement.
We’ve seen it often enough.
Sales organisations simple don’t recognise the stubbornness
of old habits and entrenched ways of thinking.
What
impact does attending a training program have on change?
A study conducted a number of years ago found that within one
month of leaving a sales training program salespeople had lost 87%
of the new skills they had learned during the training program.
If salespeople are returned to the same environment (same
metrics, same rewards, same supervision) as before then training, no
matter how excellent it is, has no lasting impact.
It
takes longer than you think
Everyone
wants the quick fix. Sales are down this month - must do a training
program. In fact the best time for change is in the good
times. As a general rule efficiency can be built more
quickly than effectiveness. It’s a faster job to build efficiency
e.g.. increase call rates, decrease expenses than it is to build the
levels of skills and effectiveness needed for selling today. As a
general rule - it takes about two years of concerted effort to start to
see change. So no instant results - no instant gratification.
You
can’t improve salespeople without improving sales management
One
of the most common mistakes companies make in efforts to improve sales
performance is to focus exclusively on salespeople. Experience has
shown that sales managers are even more critical for creating durable
performance change. Really proficient sales supervision can do
wonders to improve the skills, strategies and competencies of average
salespeople. Conversely, mediocre supervision can put a big dent in
the effectiveness of quite good salespeople.
Sales
managers are the primary performance coach, which is a crucially important
role. They must be leaders and coaches rather than administrators and
organisers. They must
be able to coach their staff in the structured consultative selling
process and be able to lead by example as many of the skills need to be
continually reinforced on the job.
Why is
coaching so important?
Studies
of high performing sales teams consistently shows that systematic high
quality coaching is a critical element in performance. However, many
supervisors don’t like to coach and their people aren’t exactly
enthusiastic either. Why then should coaching be given so much
importance?
Skills
acquired through training alone evaporate fast. The role of coaching is to
provide the reinforcement needed to maintain and enhance skills.
This is not to suggest that training is unimportant. In fact, a well
designed combination of training and coaching is by far the most effective
and economical way to develop skills and see a change in sales
performance.
Change
levers
Creating
major or sustainable improvements in sales performance requires a
systematic change effort. Its success rests on the active
involvement and leadership of top management, not just on management
within the sales function. In particular changing the sales force
will require actions in line with the following change levers:
-
Clear
vision of how to create value for customers through the sales process;
-
Organisation
structured to focus on customers and providing added value for them;
-
Training
programs to improve skills and develop strategies for sales, support
staff and management;
-
Rewards
and performance measurement systems that encourage and reinforce
change.
Level 7, 505 St Kilda Rd Melbourne VIC 3004 Australia Mobile 0412 369 223 · Office 61 3 98874038 · Fax 61 3 98200777
©2008 Richardson Management Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
|